|
Thoughts on Education & HomeschoolingGo to Safer Child Educating Your Child page Note: All of the "Thoughts on..." pages represent Safer Child opinion and/or advocacy efforts. Remember: we aren't psychologists, psychiatrists or social workers. Our thoughts come from experience, observation, feedback and research. If you aren't interested in our opinion or advocacy efforts (and we aren't offended if you aren't), you can still obtain the information you're looking for from the other pages. If you would like to comment on anything we've said, please do so. We'd love to hear from you and learn from you, and we thank you for visiting our site. This article, and all other articles posted on our Web site, are protected by copyright and may not be reprinted or distributed without express permission from Safer Child, Inc.
Get back to proper education Inferior education is one of this nations preventable tragedies, so its easy to sympathize with people who want to homeschool their children away from the craziness. Shootings, metal detectors bans on purses, for heavens sake. And school administrators seem to have occasional hormonal fits that cloud their judgment. Having experienced a few administrator-fits, we understand wanting to educate a child in a fit-free environment. Thirty years ago, administrators at our school tried something new. Someone who clearly was bored decided that students should be grouped according to ability, not age. Most children wound up in siblings classes. They were embarrassed and confused. Misbehavior went up; achievement went down. Eventually, after the year was totally disrupted, the system was abandoned and regular classes reinstated. We were reminded of that in 1995, when Kentuckys Education Department decided to mix together children from kindergarten through third grade. Almost 30 years ago, administrators at our school decided that each class warranted two grades: one for achievement and one for effort. The goal, we suppose, was to reward underachievers who tried. But in reality, the effort grade was a political/social tool. No longer was it enough to learn the material. Good grades actually went down if teachers decided students werent expending enough effort. Conversely, students who could snow teachers got grades they didnt deserve. We were reminded of that a few years ago, when makers of the SAT announced plans to provide "disadvantaged" students with opportunities to "improve" their scores. One plan was to give credit for "striving." What this means is that some students would have scores that exceeded their achievements, and others wouldnt. And what do you suppose theyd all learn about fairness and the value of achievement? It was probably inevitable. Billions of dollars have been thrown at education, but grades havent gone up and the education gap hasnt closed. Rather than figure out why and admit some hard truths some people would rather inflate grades and pretend theyve solved the problem. Thats a sharp slap in the face of poorly educated children. Grade inflation wont get them the education they need to be competitive and to follow their dreams. There just isnt any substitute for learning, and the only way to learn is to sit down and do it. Students and teachers have to work as hard as it takes, and administrators have to stay out of it. And therein lies one problem with public education. Too often, administrators wont stay out of it. The benefit to good-quality homeschooling, of course, is that the parents are the teachers and administrators, and the buck stops with them. Here's our vision of an excellent education program:
Sounds good, doesnt it? And suddenly it becomes clear how far some institutions of education have wandered from real education. Unless we want homeschooling to be the norm instead of the exception, those institutions somehow need to find their way back again.
|
|
Safer Child, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization with federal tax-exempt status. Please note: 1) External organizations listed herein do not necessarily endorse Safer Child positions, nor do we necessarily endorse theirs. We list them as a courtesy and aren't responsible for their accuracy, completeness or content. 2) We recommend you maintain a healthy skepticism when reviewing information on the Internet; it might appear to be reliable -- yet actually be false, misleading, incomplete, out-of-date and/or intentionally harmful. 3) There might be material on the Internet that you disagree with or find objectionable; preview all sites before viewing them with your child. 4) We are not responsible for external addresses/phone numbers changing without our knowledge. 5) The information and commentary on this site are not substitutes for professional advice from your doctor, lawyer, or mental health professional. 6) Requests for permission to republish, copy and/or distribute any material found on this Web site should be directed to Safer Child, Inc.
Copyright 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Safer Child, Inc. All rights reserved. |